The first stop for my spring break is Chicago. On a gloomy and overcast morning, I arrived at the Art Institute of
Chicago. It was 10:40, ten minutes after the museum opened, and a crowd of people
was already waiting in line. I intentionally picked a weekday to visit, hoping
that I would not encounter a flood of people. On second thought, people coming
here are all art-lovers and what could be better than sharing masterpieces with
these people?
After twenty-minutes
wait, I entered the museum and walked right up to find Picasso's works and get
ready to be enlightened. I first entered Gallery 246, Picasso and Cézanne. This exhibition is part of the nine
special installations around the museum that explore sources of inspiration for
Picasso and works by those he inspires. Luckily, I ran into a group of students
who were having an Art History class. They settled at a corner, around the
professor and in front of the famous painting: Madame Cézanne in a Red Armchair. I sat near them and "audited" the
lecture with delight.
The teacher, an elegant
lady in a neutral-color outfit, started the lecture by asking the students' understanding
of the Madame Cézanne painting. The
students provided various answers and finally approached an answer that lies at the
heart of Cubism painting – multiple perspectives. The teacher said that Cubism, rather than
being awkward, accords with the way human perceive the world. When looking at an object in
detail, people keep changing focusing point so that they can best understand
the object. Similarly, Cubists create images from different directions and
present several aspects of a subject all at once. Cubism paintings puzzle viewers
because of the media limit. From the traditional western painting theory, a
good painting should represent the subject as realistic as possible; therefore
it provides a one-perspective angle in order to make sense of the space. The
Cubism, seeking to represent the real experience of the viewer, breaks down the
subject to different components and deal with them separately. This expression
fails to make sense of the space when presenting on paper – a flat medium.
One cannot be
too conscience, too sincere, or too submissive to nature. ---House on a River
At noon, I went to the Modern Wing to attend
a public talk. The lady who gave the talk had a deep understanding of Picasso's works as well as other contemporary
art. She led the listeners, a group of twenty people, to the third floor where
some masterpieces from the Philadelphia Museum of Art were located. She first
gave a brief introduction of Cubism.
The main subject matters of Cubism are
ordinary subjects such as portraits, still lives and landscapes. It was
developed after the Rose Period of Picasso, and contradicts with
Impressionism which mostly used pleasing colors. Cubists believe that art
cannot only be beautiful, and therefore their works challenge the traditional aesthetic. We started from the emblematic Self-Portrait with Palette, a painting by the French artist Édouard
Manet. This painting resembles Portrait
of Gertrude Stein (1906) done by Picasso in the same year. This painting
suggests the nature of Picasso’s work by showing a mixture of the subject and
the background. There is no glorifying of human. Instead, human recedes to the
background and makes patterns more important.
Then we moved on to Guitar and Glass, a painting by Juan Gris. Gris teraveled to Paris
in 1906, and soon moved to the neighborhood of Montmartre. He met Pablo Picasso
and Georges Braque and eventually joined their artistic circle and participated
in the development of Cubism. In this painting, he incorporated objects often
used in Cubist still life paintings – musical instruments, newspapers, a glass
and a tabletop. The combination of the wood texture wallpaper and other
elements is an evidence of early collage. The repeated outline of the guitar
resembles the analytic Cubism, whereas the composition reflects the synthetic
Cubism. The overlapping planes, flattened appearance and rhythmic patterns
reject the illusion that these are still life. One explanation for the anomaly
in the composition is that the painter simply wants to complete the
composition.
We were then led to the monumental Three Musicians (1921). Picasso did a similar painting under the same title depicting the same subjects, now in the Museum of Modern Art in New York City. In this painting, Picasso used flat pattern to express subjects such as tilted tabletop, which probably inspired by the Cezanne painting, and dispositional hands in the harlequin figure.
Our tour was concluded by a series of
Synthetic Cubism paintings by Fernard Léger[1].
The four paintings on display were, as Léger described, of his “monumental
era”. Léger said " I had smashed the human body, so I began putting it together
again, finding the face again." Reclining Woman (1922) is a masterpiece
during this era. The body of the woman is mainly made up of basic geometric
forms; her face shows no emotions. One thing that I noticed
was the common color combination in three of the four paintings, which were the
basic colors blue, yellow and red. These highly saturated colors, in my
opinion, are intended to correspond to the basic geometric shapes and form a
strong visual impact on viewers. Any moderate use of color would weaken the
overall sense of the painting.
After the talk, I stayed on the third floor and watched some non-Picasso-related exhibitions. And, voila! Here are some of my favorite paintings.
After the talk, I stayed on the third floor and watched some non-Picasso-related exhibitions. And, voila! Here are some of my favorite paintings.
What can you see here? Bird and fish shapes? Human mouths, noses, eyes and necks?
A collection of American experiences. Love this multimedia work!
The Beginning - Barnett Newman
After the one-hour talk, I was mentally
excited but physically exhausted. I went downstairs and ordered a sweet potato
soup combo at Caffe Moderno.
I had a cup of water to reset my mind and get
ready to absorb more Cubism and “awkwardness” (I use quotation mark here
because, after watching so many deconstructed paintings, I can no longer define
what is awkwardness).
I dipped the whole wheat bread in my sweet potato soup
and let the viscous soup permeate through every space of the bread. The
excellent taste refreshed me. I stayed for another twenty minutes and then set
out to watch the main exhibition Picasso
and Chicago. (to be continued)
[1]
Joseph Fernand Henri Léger was a French painter, sculptor, and filmmaker. In
his early works he created a personal form of Cubism. During his
service in the French Army in World War I, he produced many sketches of artillery pieces and
painted Soldier with a Pipe (1916).
It was then that his “mechanical period” began.
No comments:
Post a Comment